SHIV PANWAR @ CHADRASHEKHAR S/O SHRI SURENDRA PANWAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/13317/2025 · 2025-12-01
Sameer Jain
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46038 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46038 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:48664] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13317/2025 Shiv Panwar @ Chadrashekhar S/o Shri Surendra Panwar, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Ganesh Chowk, Near Sarkari Nal, Harijan Basti, Khedli Fatak, Kota (Raj.) Police Station Bheemganj Mandi, Kota (Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail, Kota From 06- 05-2025 And Transferred In Central Jail, Bharatpur). ----Applicant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Applicant(s) : Mr. Jaswant Singh Rathore with Mr. Kuldeep Verma Mr. Ankit Kumar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order 01/12/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No.35/2025 registered at Police Station Kaithunipole, District Kota for the offence(s) under Sections 189(4), 332(c), 308(2), 308(5), 111(2)(b), 111(4) of BNS.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submitted that the applicant is a young man, aged about 35 years and is sole bread earner of the family. It is submitted that the applicant is in custody ever since 06.05.2025 and charge-sheet has already been filed. It is also submitted that the criminal antecedent reflected also is a myth as applicant has already been acquitted in that
[2025:RJ-JP:48664] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-13317/2025] matter. It is further submitted that the applicant is not named in the FIR and one of the co-accused has already been enlarged on bail.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
4. Considering the arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties, considering the custody period; that the applicant is sole bread earner of the family; that the charge-sheet has already been filed and trial will take a long time and looking to the overall
facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is inclined to allow the bail application of the accused-applicant and enlarge him on bail.
5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Shiv Panwar @ Chadrashekhar S/o Shri Surendra Panwar shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.
(SAMEER JAIN),J CHANDAN /82