Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 205
Jaswant Singh
Sh. Krishan Kumar and
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Present: -
NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
that the order dated 15.02.2022 (Annexure P Bench of this Court in State of Punjab representation dated complied with by way of passing speaking 12.11.2024 (Annexure R is accordingly submitted that nothing survives in the present petition and the same may be disposed of accordingly.
submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner.
speaking order, in accordance with law.
11.08.2025 rishu
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Jaswant Singh
Versus Sh. Krishan Kumar and another
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Mr. PS Bhandari, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG, Punjab.
NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
At the very outset, learned counsel for the the order dated 15.02.2022 (Annexure P Bench of this Court in CWP-2457-2022, State of Punjab and others’ directing the respondents to decide the representation dated 11.10.2021 moved by complied with by way of passing speaking 12.11.2024 (Annexure R accordingly submitted that nothing survives in the present petition and the same may be disposed of accordingly.
Learned counsel for the State has not di
submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner.
In view of the above, the present petition stands disposed of.
The petitioner would be at liberty to challenge the aforesaid speaking order, in accordance with law.
Rule stands discharged.
Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. .2025
Whether speaking/reasoned
Whether Reportable
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP-1157-2022
Date of Decision: 11.08.2025
.… Petitioner
.... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. PS Bhandari, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG, Punjab.
learned counsel for the petitioner submits the order dated 15.02.2022 (Annexure P-1) passed by a co-ordinate , titled as ‘Jaswant Singh vs. directing the respondents to decide the 11.10.2021 moved by the petitioner stands duly complied with by way of passing speaking 12.11.2024 (Annexure R-1). It accordingly submitted that nothing survives in the present petition and
Learned counsel for the State has not disputed the aforesaid
submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner. In view of the above, the present petition stands disposed of. The petitioner would be at liberty to challenge the aforesaid Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
( NIDHI GUPTA )
JUDGE Yes/No
Yes/No
submits ordinate vs. directing the respondents to decide the the petitioner stands duly It accordingly submitted that nothing survives in the present petition and sputed the aforesaid The petitioner would be at liberty to challenge the aforesaid RISHU KATARIA 2025.08.13 18:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment.