MAHESH KUMAR SHARMA S/O SHRI MANGI RAM SHARMA v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/12468/2025 · 2025-11-21
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46025 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46025 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:47298] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12468/2025 Mahesh Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Mangi Ram Sharma, Aged About 46 Years, R/o Village Ballupura, Post Raithal, Via Kaladera, District Jaipur, (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Special Secretary, Law And Legal Affairs Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Advocate General, Government Of Rajasthan, Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur Bench, Jaipur.
3. The Additional Chief Secretary, Finance Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sukhdev Singh Solanki Mr. Vibhuti Bhushan Sharma For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 21/11/2025
1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:-
“ It is therefore, humbly prayed that Your Lordships may kindly be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition and by an appropriate writ,
order
or
direction:- I. The respondents may be directed to make payment on the basis of the principle of equal pay for equal work or at least minimum pay scale of the Lower Division Clerk (LDC) (Junior Assistant) Employee. may be directed to be paid
w.e.f.
the
date
of
12
[2025:RJ-JP:47298] (2 of 3) [CW-12468/2025] inception in service with its arrear in the interest
of
justice. ii. The respondents may be directed to undertake the exercise of regularization of the services of the Petitioner by way of screening or otherwise in the interest of justice. iii. The respondents may also be directed not to take any punitive or coercive action against the
Petitioner. iv. Any other order or direction which this Hon'ble court deem just and proper may also be passed in favour of the Petitioner. v. Cost of the writ petition may also be awarded in favour of the Petitioner.”
2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents-Authority to consider and resolve his grievances.
3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation with a reasoned and speaking
order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition.
[2025:RJ-JP:47298] (3 of 3) [CW-12468/2025]
4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /81