Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46014 (KAR)

SMT.SHARADAMA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/5223/2025 · 2025-02-24

Sachin Shankar Magadum

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:8170 WP No. 5223 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM WRIT PETITION NO. 5223 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. SHARADAMA W/O LATE SRI. PARASHURAM AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS SANTE KADUR VILLAGE BHANDARI CAMP, NIDHIGE 1 HOBLI SHIVAMOGGA TALUK, SHIVAMOGGA -577 202. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRASHANTH .H.S, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE VIDHANA SOUDHA, AMBEDKAR BEEDI BENGALURU -560 001. BY ITS PRINCIPALSECRETARY 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT SHIVAMOGGA -577 201. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND VETERINARY SERVICES CMC BUILDING, 2ND FLOOR, NEHRU ROAD SHIVAMOGGA -577 201. 4. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT SHIVAMOGGA-577 201. Digitally signed by AL BHAGYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:8170 WP No. 5223 of 2025 5. THE TAHASILDAR SHIVAMOGGA TALUK SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT SHIVAMOGGA-577 201. 6. THE COMMITTEE FOR REGULARIZATION OF BHAGARKUM SHIVAMOGGA TALUK SHIVAMOGGA-577 401. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B.P. RADHA, AGA) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 30/11/2024, BEING AN AMENDMENT ORDER PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT BEARING NO. SMGDC. LND (1)LG1/432/2024(E-517598), VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND CONSEQUENTLY SET ASIDE THE ENTRIES MADE PURSUANT TO MUTATION REGISTER DATED 30/11/2024 IN MR BEARING NO. MRT43/2024-25 AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM ORAL ORDER This petition is filed assailing the order passed by respondent No.2 vide Annexure-A wherein by way of an amendment, petition land is also included and is now - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:8170 WP No. 5223 of 2025 allotted to the department of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Services. 2. Petitioner contends that his application seeking regularization is pending consideration and therefore, the authorities could not have diverted the petition land thereby taking away the rights of the petitioner seeking regularization. 3. Learned AGA, on instructions, has produced the true copy of the proceedings of the Land Grant Committee indicating that petitioner's application was dealt by the Committee and the Committee after verifying the records has declined to recommend and petitioner's claim is rejected. 4. Recording the submission of the learned AGA, petition is dismissed. - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:8170 WP No. 5223 of 2025 5. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to challenge the said recommendation in the manner known to law. Sd/- (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE ALB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 44