2025:HHC:636 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP Nos. 117, 119, 121, 122 to 125, 140, 233 and 235 of 2025 Decided on : 04.01.2025 1. CWP No. 117 of 2025 Sh. Banti Kumar. …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another. …Respondents 2. CWP No. 119 of 2025 Sh. Ashish Kumar. …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another. …Respondents 3. CWP No. 121 of 2025 Sh. Amit Kumar. …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another. …Respondents 2 2025:HHC:636 4. CWP No. 122 of 2025 Sh. Mandeep Singh. …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another. …Respondents 5. CWP No. 123 of 2025 Sh. Vijay Kumar. …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another. …Respondents 6. CWP No. 124 of 2025 Sh. Sunil. …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another. …Respondents 7. CWP No. 125 of 2025 Sh. Hanish Sharma. …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another. …Respondents 3 2025:HHC:636 8. CWP No. 140 of 2025 Sh. Virender Kumar. …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another. …Respondents 9. CWP No. 233 of 2025 Sh. Om Prakash. …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another. …Respondents 10. CWP No. 235 of 2025 Sh. Ashok Kumar. …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another. …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner(s) : Mr. Vaibhav Tanwar, Advocate, in all the petitions. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General, in all the petitions. 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 4 2025:HHC:636 Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) As common issue of law and facts is involved in all these petitions, therefore, the same are being disposed of by way of common judgment. 2. Issue notice. Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 3. On the request of learned counsel for the petitioners, without making any observation on the merits of the cases, these petitions are disposed of with the direction that let the representations filed by the petitioners be decided by the Competent Authority, in the light of the averments made therein as well as the judgment, if any, being relied upon by the petitioners, within a period of eight weeks’ from today, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge January 04, 2025 (Shivank Thakur)