378 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-2329-2025 Date of decision: 30.04.2025 Manisha ...Petitioner Versus Vipin Kumar ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present: None. **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. As per report of the Registry, notice could not be issued to the respondent for want of process fee. 2. Although, the case has been called twice but no one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner. 3. Accordingly, the present revision petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. 30.04.2025 (VIKAS BAHL) Pawan JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No PAWAN KUMAR 2025.05.01 17:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document