Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46004 (AP)

Gangavarapu Venkata Pratap Chowdary, v. Government of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/12640/2019 · 2025-09-25

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010277002019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 12640/2019 Between: 1. GANGAVARAPU VENKATA PRATAP CHOWDARY,, S/O. VENKATA RAMANAIAH NAIDU, AGED 30, R/O. DOOR NO. 2-182, DHANALAKSHMIPURAM, SATYAMJINAGAR, NELLORE RURAL, NELLORE DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, AMARAVATI. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR RURAL DISTRICT, GUNTUR. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, WOMEN POLICE STATION, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in calling me and my family members to attend the police station unless our presence is required for 2 any cognizable offence and without written intimation and compelling us to convey the properties of my father and mother as per the dictates of my wife is illegal, contrary to law, arbitrary and without jurisdiction and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct 3rd respondent police not to call the petitioner or his family members to attend the police station without written intimation and unless their presence is required for any cognizable offence pending disposal of the writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P SAI SURYA TEJA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 12640 of 2019 The Court made the following Order: Sri P.Sai Surya Teja, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication. 2. Learned Additional Government Pleader representing the State is in attendance. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI Dated: 26.09.2025 PSA 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 12640 of 2019 Date: 26.09.2025 PSA