[3396 ] IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY ,THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 39936 OF 2018 Between: Kopuri Lakshmi, W/o. late Kopuri Jesudanam Age: 43 years, Occ: House Wife, R/o. H.No. 8-10-131/A, Krishna Tulasi Nagar, Swarna Barathi Colony, Guntur District. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State Bank of India, Represented by its Chief General Manager Amaravathi Circle, Gunfundry, Abids, Hyderabad. 2. The Branch Manager, Repudi Branch, State Bank of India, Phirangipuram, Guntur District. ...Respondents-^ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or order or direction particularly one in the nature of “Writ of Mandamus” declaring the the Respondents in not releasing of death benefits i.e.. Pension, Gratuity, G.S.I., and other attendant benefits to the Petitioner is illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and violation 14, 16, 21, and 39 (d) of the Constitution of India and Consequently the respondents to release the death benefits to the petitioner forthwith. lA NO: 1 OF 201« more action of P.F. of Article direct Petition under Section 151 CPC stated in the affidavit filed i praying that in the circumstances in support of the petition, the High Court may be / direct the Respondents to release the death benefits to the considering representation dated 09-10-2018 during to pleased petitioner by of writ petition; petitionerrSRI. P ANIMI REDDY pendency Counsel for the Counsel for the Respondents: SRI B S PRASAD Court made the following: The I \ APHC010829242018 COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH at amaravati original Jurisdiction) [3396] IN THE HIGH (Special TWO pratapa THE ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENT(S) Between: Kopuri Lakshmi AND The State Bank Of India and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: I.P.ANIMI REDDY counsel for the Respondent(S). l.BS PRASAD The court made the following: ORDER: ^i,ir,r. inrii licence of of India for the following relief; is filed by the Petitioner sec The instant Writ Petition is Article 226 of the Constitution « ... to issue an appropriate ^grlng^thfaS^^ Lspondente in ■ Fho nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring p p g.S.I and other norrelSng of death benefits i e ?" ““^tra,^-' and against the listed today under the caption this Court under Proceedings would show that none directed to be 2. The earlier Docket and the matter was the Petitioner "For Dismissal". 3. Despite the matter being represented for the Petitioner today. 4. Learned Standing' For dismissal", none listed under the caption is in attendance. Counsel for the respondent-Bank is f 2 5. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. \ Sd/- SHAIK MOHD. RAH assistant registrar //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to SRI. P ANIMI REDDY Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to SRI. B S PRASAD Advocate [OPUC] 3. Three CD Copies HIGH COURT \ DATED:06/05/2025 ORDER WP.No.39936 of 2018 I 2 < SEP 2025 S Ciirranl Saction . ^^£^SPATeM6P..-'*' ?Ro”sKUTOr NON-