[2025:RJ-JP:48131] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18409/2025 1. Vandana Sharma D/o Ramesh Chand Sharma, W/o Abhishek Sharma, Aged About 46 Years, R/o 2/172, Saket Nagar, Housing Board, Beawar, Ajmer (Rajasthan) 2. Doly Gupta W/o Nitin Kumar Singhal, Aged About 30 Years, 65, R/o Shivperrl Colony, Kapoor Wala Road, Muhana, Jaipur. 3. Lalita Meena D/o Bhagavan Sahay Meena W/o Rajesh Kumar Meena, Aged About 33 Years, R/o H.no. 69, Street No. 10, Saraswati Colony, Roteda Road, Kota (Rajasthan) 4. Sunita Saini D/o Shobhag Mal Saini, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Raj Talkies Ke Piche, Saini Nagar, Tonk (Rajasthan) ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Swai Madhopur. 3. The Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Gangapur City, District Sawai Madhopur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hari Krishan Sharma For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Judgment / Order 27/11/2025 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioners with following prayer:- “(i) The Hon’ble Court may kindly be declare the illegal, arbitrary and discriminatory action of the re- spondents by which the respondents are not granting the notional and other service benefits to the petition- ers from the year 2013 while the other similar nature persons have already granted the notional and other [2025:RJ-JP:48131] (2 of 3) [CW-18409/2025] service benefits from the year 2013 under LDC re- cruitment, 2013 (ii) That the respondents may kindly be directed to be given the notional and other service benefits to the petitioners from the year 2013 under the LDC recruit- ment 2013 where from the other candidates accorded appointment under said recruitment.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioners while referring and relying upon judgment dated 11.09.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13699/2025 titled as ‘Rajesh Saini and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Anr.’ submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court. He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order. 3. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioners and also material placed on record, the writ petition is disposed of in light of Rajesh Saini and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Anr (supra) passed by this Court. 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioners is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents- Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case referred hereinabove with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioners either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioners have provided E-mail in their representation. If the petitioners are still aggrieved, they have a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. [2025:RJ-JP:48131] (3 of 3) [CW-18409/2025] 5. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MONU /127