[2025:RJ-JP:44987] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6519/2025 Pankaj Kumar S/o Sh. Banwari Lal, Aged About 52 Years, R/o Bhodki, P.S. Ghuda Gaurji, District - Jhunjhunu (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Rajasthan, through Public Prosecutor. 2. Motilal Saini S/o Sh. Heera Lal, aged about 48 Years, R/o Ward No. 11, Town Udaipurwati, Teh.-Udaipurwati, District - Jhunjhunu (Raj.). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Brajma Prakash For Respondent(s) : Mr.Amit Punia, PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 10/11/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after filing of charge-sheet before the trial Court, compromise took place between the parties and the petitioner submitted an application for compounding the offences. Counsel submits that the said application submitted by the petitioner has not been decided and in the meantime, statements of the complainant were recorded, but he has not supported the version of prosecution. 2. In the considered opinion of this Court, once an application seeking compounding of offences has been filed before the trial Court, it is expected from the trial Court to decide the said application and then proceed with the matter in accordance with law. [2025:RJ-JP:44987] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-6519/2025] 3. Considering the above, instant petition stands disposed of with the expectation from the trial Court to decide the pending application on the next date and if not possible on the next date, fix a short date for the same. 4. With the aforesaid observation, the instant petition stands disposed of. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /34