JYOTI MISHRA DAUGHTER OF SHRI RAM KISHORE SHARMA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/17407/2025 · 2025-11-19
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45993 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45993 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:48451] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17407/2025 Jyoti Mishra Daughter Of Shri Ram Kishore Sharma, Aged About 40 Years, R/o G40, Sudama Nagar, Tonk Road, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, School Education Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. Director, Secondary Education Cum Addl. State Project Director, Senior Samagra Sikhsha Abhiran, Smsa, Rajasthan, Bikaner.
3. Sugandha Gupta, Now Posted In Place Of The Petitioner At Govt. Sen. Sec. School Ajay Rajpura, Sanganer, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashok Bansal Mr. Pawan Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG with Mr. Vishal Kumar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 19/11/2025
1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:-
“It is therefore prayed that this writ petition may kindly be allowed and by appropriate writ,
order or directions the following order may be passed: 1) That the transfer order dated 22.09.2025 and the reliving order dated 25.09.2025 may kindly be quashed and set aside. 2) That the respondents may be directed to allow the petitioner to work as Principal, in
[2025:RJ-JP:48451] (2 of 3) [CW-17407/2025] Govt. Sen. Sec. School Ajay Rajpura, Sanganer, Jaipur with regular salary and consequential benefits. 3) Any other relief which this Hon'ble court may deem fit in favor of the petitioner may also be awarded to the petitioner. 4) That the cost of the writ petition may also kindly be awarded in favor of the petitioner..”
2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve her grievances.
3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation with a reasoned and speaking
order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in her representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, she has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition.
4. The order dated 22.09.2025 and relieving order dated 25.09.2025 qua the present petitioner shall remain stayed till disposal of the representation by the respondent(s) and the petitioner be permitted to continue at same post, where she was working prior to issuance of order dated
22.09.2025.
[2025:RJ-JP:48451] (3 of 3) [CW-17407/2025]
5. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /296