TADIBOINA NAGARATNAMMA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WA/993/2025 · 2025-09-15
Dhiraj Singh Thakur, Ravi Cheemalapati
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45993 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45993 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI MAIN CASE No.W.A.No.993 of 2025 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No. DATE ORDER OFFICE NOTE
8.
28.04.2026
CMR,J & GTK,J
I.A.No.1 of 2026
No counter reported by the respondents.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.
Petition is allowed, permitting the petitioners to implead the District Legal Services Authority, Guntur and Andhra Pradesh State Legal Services Authority as party respondent Nos.8 and 9 in the writ petition. W.A.No.993 of 2025
I.A.No.1 of 2026 is allowed, permitting the petitioners to implead proposed respondents as respondent Nos.8 and 9 in the writ petition.
Sri S. Lakshminarayana Reddy, learned Standing Counsel takes notice for respondent Nos.8 and 9 and requests time to seek instructions.
List the matter on 23.06.2026. I.A.No.1 of 2025
In the meanwhile, there shall be interim direction to the respondents, not to sell the property in question, which is the subject matter of the writ petition, till the next date of hearing.
______ CMR,J
______ GTK,J MDP
2