Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45991 (ALL)

RAJIK AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

A482/27034/2017 · 2025-05-20

Prashant Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:86284 Court No. - 87 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 27034 of 2017 Applicant :- Rajik And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Garun Pal Singh,Vikas Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party :- Ashok Kumar Singh Bais,G.A. Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for applicants, Sri S.K. Srivastava, Advocate holding brief of Sri A.K.S. Baish, learned counsel for opposite party no.2, Sri Jyoti Kumar Singh, learned A.G.A. for State and perused the record. 2. Challenge in this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is to quash the impugned charge-sheet no.41 of 2017 dated 23.04.2017 as well as cognizance order dated 20.05.2017 in Special Case No.37 of 2017 arising out of Case Crime No.0035 of 2017, under Sections 452, 323, 504, 325 IPC and 3 (1) of SC/ST Act, P.S. Titro, District Saharanpur pending in the Court of Additional District and Sessions Judge, Court No.2, Saharanpur. 3. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for applicants submits that he wants to withdraw the application and liberty may be given to the applicants to file a bail application before the court of competent jurisdiction. 4. In view of above, the application is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to the applicants to appear before court below and file an appropriate application for bail, which shall be decided in the light of decision rendered in Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2021) 10 SCC 773. Order Date :- 21.5.2025 S.P. Digitally signed by :- SANJAY PURI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad