[2025:RJ-JP:49291] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17355/2025 Muskan Sharma D/o Late Shri Banwari Lal Sharma, Aged About 20 Years, Resident Of Nana Sahab Ka Bada, Bajariya, Dholpur (Rajasthan) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Phed, Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan) 2. Executive Engineer, Phed, Division Dholpur, Dholpur (Rajasthan) 3. Assistant Engineer, Phed Sub Division Dholpur, Machkund Choraha, G.t. Road, Dholpur (Rajasthan) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Najeeb Anwar Khan For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 04/12/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “a) Quash and set aside the communication dated 03.09.2025 (Annexure-2) vide which the application of the Petitioner for getting an appointment on Compassionate ground has been returned back. b) Direct the respondents to grant an appointment to the Petitioner on compassionate ground in accordance with the rules of the Rajasthan Compassionate Appointment of Dependants of Deceased Government Servants Rules, 1996. c) Any other appropriate writ, order or direction which may be considered just and proper in the facts and circumstances [2025:RJ-JP:49291] (2 of 2) [CW-17355/2025] of the case may kindly also be issued in favour of the Petitioner.” 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve her grievances. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in her representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, she is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /317