IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.19910 of 2023 Tridip Ray …. Petitioner Mr. M. Mishra, Adv. -versus- Sr. Divisional Manager, L.I.C. of India, Cuttack & Others …. Opp. Parties Mr. A.K. Mohanty, Adv. for O.P. Nos.1 and 2 Mr. A.P. Das, Adv. for O.P. No.3 CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No ORDER 26.06.2025 02. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 3. The Petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition with the following prayer: - “It is therefore prayed that your lordships be graciously pleased to admit the writ petition and issue a rule NISI to the ops to show cause as to:- (a) Why a direction will not be given to the op. no.2 to consider the representation vide Annexure-3 and pass reasoned order keeping in view the provision of law within a stipulated period. And if the ops do not show cause then the rule be made absolute by issuing appropriate writ/order/direction to the ops and any other order as deem fit be passed.” 4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that through highlighting his grievances, the petitioner has filed a representation vide Annexure-3 to the Writ Petition, but till date nothing has been done in the matter. In such background, he prays that a direction be issued to opposite party No.2 to take a decision on the above noted petition within a specific time period. 5. Considering the submissions made and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court directs opposite party No.2 to take a decision on the above noted representation in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order and communicate the result of such exercise to the petitioner. 6. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Basudev