Meesala Narayanamma, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/10567/2020 · 2025-09-22
B Krishna Mohan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45982 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45982 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010167942020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 10567/2020 Between:
1. MEESALANARAYANAMMA,, W/O LATE GOPALAM, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, R/O. METTAVALASA VILLAGE, BOBBILI MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT
2. MEESALARAMU,, W/O LATE APPA RAO, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC..HOUSE WIFE, R/O. METTAVALASA VILLAGE, BOBBILI MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT
3. SATTI PARVATAMMA,, W/O LATE CHANDRAYYA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, R/O. METTAVALASA VILLAGE, BOBBILI MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT
3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, PARVATHIPURAM SUB DIVISION, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT
4.
THE TAHSILDAR, BOBBILI MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be
2 HBKM,J W.P.No.10567 of 2020
pleased toto issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the highhanded action of the respondents No. 2 to 4 herein in proposing to provide house sites to the weaker sections under NavaratnaluPedhaluAndarikiIllu scheme in petitioner's lands situated in 1) Sy No. 610-3 to an extent of Ac 2.84 cents, 2) Sy No. 610-3B to an extent of Ac 2.84 cents, 3) Sy No. 610-4(1P) to an extent of Ac 1.51 cents of Gollapalli Revenue Village, Bobbili Mandal, Vizianagaram District, without issuing any notice, without initiating the proceedings under The Right to Fair Cbmpensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (Act No. 30 of 2013), and without following the due process of law as illegal, arbitrary, against the principles on natural justice and consequently direct the respondents No. 2 to 4 not dispossess the petitioners from the possession and enjoyment of the lands situated in 1) Sy No. 610-3 to an extent of Ac 2.84 cents, 2) Sy No. 610-3B to an extent of Ac 2.84 cents, 3) Sy No. 610-4(1P) to an extent of Ac 1.51 cents of Gollapalli Revenue Village, Bobbili Mandal, Vizianagaram District IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings including dispossession of the petitioners from the lands situated in 1) Sy No. 610-3 to an extent of Ac 2.84 cents, 2) Sy No. 610-3B to an extent of Ac 2.84 cents, 3) Sy No. 610-4(1P) to an extent of Ac 1.51 cents of Gollapalli Revenue Village, Bobbili Mandal, Vizianagaram District Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1.
TADDI NAGESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE
3 HBKM,J W.P.No.10567 of 2020
The Court made the following Order: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. 2. This writ petition is filed questioning the action of the respondent Nos.2 to 4 herein in proposing to provide house sites to the weaker sections under <NavaratnaluPedaluAndarikiIllu= Scheme in petitioners’ lands situated in 1) Sy.No.610-3 to an extent of Ac.2.84 cents, 2) Sy.No.610-3B to an extent of Ac.2.84 cents, 3) Sy.No.610-4(1P) to an extent of Ac.1.51 cents of Gollapalli Revenue Village, Bobbili Mandal, Vizianagaram District, without issuing any notice, without initiating the proceedings under The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (Act No.30 of 2013), and without following the due process of law. 3. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submits that the respondent authorities concerned will follow the due procedure with respect to the subject lands. 4. In view of the above said facts and circumstances, the respondent Nos.2 to 4 are directed to deal with the subject lands strictly in accordance with law and if the petitioners are otherwise found to be in possession of the same, they shall be dealt with strictly in accordance with law, by giving due opportunity of hearing to all the parties concerned including the petitioners and upon verification of the records and the subject lands, appropriate
4 HBKM,J W.P.No.10567 of 2020
decision shall be taken on its own merits. Any dispossession from the subject land shall not be made except by following the due process of law. 5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B.KRISHNA MOHAN
Dt: 23.09.2025 sj
5 HBKM,J W.P.No.10567 of 2020
75 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.KRISHNA MOHAN
WRIT PETITION NO. 10567 of 2020
Dt: 23.09.2025 sj