Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:47465] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4568/2015 Smt. Shanti Devi wife of Lalit Kishore Gupta, aged about 80 years, Resident of 465, Chaudhary Bhawan, Bandri Ka Nasik, Chowkdi Gangapole, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus
1. State of Rajasthan, through the Secretary, Department of Urban Development & Housing, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. Jaipur Development Authority, through its Secretary, J.L.N. Marg, Jaipur (Raj.)
3. New Pink City Grah Nirman Sahakari Samiti Limited through its Secretary, 7, Farsoiya Market, Bapu Bazar, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Non-petitioners For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arisal Singh Nathawat For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kuri for JDA Mr. Nitin Jain with Ms. Kriti Kalawalia for respondent No.3 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA
Order 24/11/2025
1. Petitioner has filed the present writ petition with following prayers:-
"It is, therefore, respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble court may very graciously be pleased to allow this writ petition and may, by an appropriate writ, order or direction, direct the non-petitioners to approve the plot/shop No. 29 in Mahaveer Nagar Scheme, Jaipur. Any other appropriate order, which the Hon'ble Court deems just and proper in the
facts and circumstances of the case may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner including
order of costs."
[2025:RJ-JP:47465] (2 of 3) [CW-4568/2015]
2. It is stated that New Pink City Grah Nirman Sahakari Samiti Limited chalked out one Residential Scheme namely; Mahaveer Nagar, Jaipur between the year 1977-1981, plan of aforesaid scheme was submitted earlier before erstwhile UIT and then before Jaipur Development Authority. The aforesaid scheme consisted about 880 residential plots, five public parks and 30 shops, out of which petitioner was allotted plot/shop No. S-29. It is further submitted that a decision was taken in building plan committee (Level-II) of Jaipur Development Authority on 12.04.1984, wherein the ratio of approving plots and facility area was decided as 60:40. It is further submitted that till date the aforesaid plot of the petitioner has not been regularized.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been contesting for last around 40 years, yet till this date no final decision whatsoever has been taken by the Jaipur Development Authority in respect of approval of plots/shops earlier allotted to the petitioner in Mahaveer Nagar Scheme.
4.
Learned counsel for the respondent- JDA submits that the scheme chalked out by the society was not in accordance with the prevailing rules and the facility area, which is required to be left as per the statutory rules, was also allotted to different allottees, therefore, the disputed plots have not yet been approved.
5. In the light of above, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of this writ petition directing the petitioner to submit his detailed representation before the Secretary, Jaipur Development Authority enclosing all the supporting documents
[2025:RJ-JP:47465] (3 of 3) [CW-4568/2015] and orders, who shall consider the same and pass speaking order within a period of two months from the date of receipt of representation. In case the representation is decided in favour of the petitioner, then necessary approval orders/lease deeds shall be issued accordingly.
6. Accordingly, the instant writ petition shall stand
disposed of.
(ANAND SHARMA),J DIVYA /25