Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45977 (PNJ)

WAZIR SINGH v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS

CWP/10629/2025 · 2025-04-22

Lisa Gill, Sudeepti Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 10629 of 2025 (O&M) Date of decision:22nd April, 2025 Wazir Singh ..Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL. HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA. Present: Mr. Varun Veer Chauhan, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. Sukhdeep Parmar, Sr. DAG Haryana. LISA GILL, J(Oral) 1. Prayer in this writ petition is for setting aside ‘Notice Inviting Tender’ dated 28.03.2025 vide which tenders have been invited for construction of PHC Building at Village Baroda Mor, Tehsil Gohana, District Sonepat. 2. After hearing learned counsel for petitioner, we do not find any cause to interfere in the matter. Petitioner is Sarpanch of Village Baroda Mor, Tehsil Gohana, District Sonepat and grievance raised is that Health Care Centre, tender for which has been floated, should be constructed at a site other than the designated site. 3. Learned counsel for the State on instructions from Mr. Ashok Kumar, SDE, Gohana submits that land required for construction of Health Care Center is 1.5/2 acres whereas the site upon which the petitioner seeks is less than 1 acre. 4. Leraned counsel for the petitioner is unable to point out any ground whatsoever which calls for interference in this matter. It is for the authorities to choose an appropriate site keeping in view the various relevant REEMA SAINI 2025.04.25 14:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh CWP No. 10629 of 2025 (O&M) -2- factors. Learned counsel for petitioner in any case is unable to point out any such glaring discrepancy which calls for interference by this Court. 5. Reference by learned counsel to the report dated 21.11.2019 is irrelevant in view of submissions made by learned counsel for the State. No other argument addressed. 6. Writ petition being devoid of any merits is accordingly dismissed. (LISA GILL) JUDGE 22nd April, 2025 (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) reema JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No REEMA SAINI 2025.04.25 14:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh