- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:7857 WP No. 16392 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 16392 OF 2021 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN: SRI. GOWTHAMVENKY S/O LATE MOTAPPA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/AT NO.64, SIDDANAPALYA VILLAGE, INDALVADI POST, KASABA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BANGALORE DISTRICT-560 301. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. V.SRINIVAS., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS HOME SECRETARY, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, CENTRAL ZONE, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001. 3. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, INFANTRY ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001. 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, BANGALORE DISTRICT, BANGALORE-560 001. 5. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANEKAL SUB-DIVISION, ANEKAL TALUK-560 301. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHANTESH SHETTAR., AGA) Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:7857 WP No. 16392 of 2021 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the writ papers, the petition is filed in the year 2021. Now we are in the month of February 2025. It's been four years. So far, scrutiny stage office objections are not complied with. As already noted above, when the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution and also for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 2 Sl No.: 14