APHC010126512025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] FRIDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN CONTEMPT CASE NO: 734/2025 Between: 1. M/S SRI VISHNU SRIRAM CONSTRUCTIONS, D.NO.4-1-735-1, 7TH STREET, ANJANEYANAGAR BADVEL, BADVEL MANDAL.YSR KADAPA DISTRICT REP BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER SRI V.DASARADHA RAMI REDDY, S/O. V RAMA MOHAN REDDY, ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI S SURESH KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI PIYUSH KUMAR, SPECIAL CHIEF SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. SRI V V NARASIMHA REDDY, COMMISSIONER THE BADVEL MUNICIPALITY, BADVEL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT 4. SRI CHINTAKUNTA SUMAN REDDY, THE DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER BADVEL MUNICIPALITY, BADVEL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT 5. SRI D SREENIVASULU, THE PAY AND ACCOUNTS OFFICER KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 2 ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the Respondents herein for wilfully and deliberately violating the order passed by this Honble Court in W.P.No. 18696/2024, dated. 11.11.2024 under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. TRIPURAM RAVITEJA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. KALYAN CHAKRAVARTHY R 2. PUNYAVATHY RUTHALA 3. GUDAPATI LAKSHMI NARAYANA 3 The Court made the following Order: The learned counsel for the respondents submits that the bill amount was paid on 31.03.2025 and the learned counsel for the petitioner also confirms the same as amounts were already paid to the petitioner. 2. In view of the same, no cause survives in this contempt case. 3. Accordingly, the contempt case is closed. The written instructions from the respondents shall be made as part of the court record. Interim order if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN 17.10.2025 NNN