Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45967 (KAR)

MR. POORNESH. H. P. v. SMT. NANDINI

MFA.CROB/57/2023 · 2025-01-20

C M Poonacha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA MFA CROSS OBJECTION NO. 57 OF 2023 IN MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.5257/2019 BETWEEN: MR. POORNESH. H. P. S/O PADME GOWDA, AGED 44 YEARS, R/O HALEKERE VILLAGE, GOWDAHALLI POST, MUDIGERE TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT. ..CROSS OBJECTOR (BY SRI. VENKATESH SOMAREDDI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1 . SMT. NANDINI W/O LATE PRAVEENA, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS. 2 . KUM PRANITHA D/O LATE PRAVEEN, AGED ABOUT 7 YEARS, REP. BY HER NATURAL GUARDIAN MOTHER/APPELLANT NO.1. 3 . SMT. RATHNA W/O SHIVAIAH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS. MFA Crob. No.57/2023 in MFA No.5257/2019 ---------------------------- 2 4 . MR. SHIVAIAH S/O MULLAIAH, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS. 5 . KUM. PALLAVI D.S., AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS, D/O SHIVAIAH. RESPONDENT NOS. 1 TO 5 ARE ALL RESIDING AT DODDAMAGARAVALLI VILLAGE, ALDUR POST AND HOBLI, CHIKKAMAGALURU TALUK. 6 . THE MANAGER SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD., E-108, RIICO INDUSTRIAL AREA, SITHAPURA JAIPUR, RAJASTHAN. 7 . CHANDRASHEKARA S/O SODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/O KESARIKE VILLAGE, ANOOR POST, CHIKKAMAGALURU TALUK. 8 . MR. JAYARAM AGED 27 YEARS, S/O NAGAIAH, R/O THORANAMAVU VILLAGE, ALDUR POST, CHIKKAMAGALURU TALUK. ..RESPONDENTS This Miscellaneous First Appeal Cross Objection filed Under Order 41 rule 22 R/W Section 173(1) OF MV ACT against the MFA Crob. No.57/2023 in MFA No.5257/2019 ---------------------------- 3 Judgment and Award dated 30.01.2019 passed in MVC No.235/2016 on the file of the II ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND MACT, CHIKKAMAGALURU awarding compensation of Rs.13,76,000/- with interest at 8 percent per annum from the date of petition till the date of payment. This Miscellaneous First Appeal Cross Objection is coming on for Orders this day, the Court made the following: ORAL ORDER Two weeks time is granted to comply with office objections, failing which the above cross-objection shall automatically stand dismissed without further orders from the Court. Sd/- JUDGE NOTE: Court Order dated 20.01.2025, not complied with. Hence Cross-Objection stands dismissed. COPY Sd/- T By: AR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR R By: MR C By: YL