[2025:RJ-JP:47317] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17885/2025 1. Bal Ram Meena S/o Shri Dalla Ram Meena, Aged About 50 Years, R/o V/p Mani, Tehsil Nainwa, District Bundi, Rajasthan 2. Kailash Chandar Meena S/o Shri Lohadkeya Meena, Aged About 53 Years, R/o Village Itawa Post Zoola Tehsil And District Sawaimadhopur, Rajasthan 3. Pappu Ram Sharma S/o Shri Bhikh Ram Sharma, Aged About 53 Years, R/o Village Thumara Post Intoli Tehsil Reni, District Alwar, Rajasthan 4. Anita Kaushik W/o Shri Pappu Ram Sharma, Aged About 51 Years, R/o Village Thumara Post Intoli Tehsil Reni, District Alwar, Rajasthan. 5. Niranjan Lal Meena S/o Shri Jagamal, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Village Amala Post Behadko Kalan Tehsil Reni, District Alwar, Rajasthan 6. Rukamni Meena W/o Shri Ramswaroop Meena, Aged About 52 Years, R/o Village Ward No 10 Neemasra Post Kakrawda Tehsil Peepalda, District Kota, Rajasthan 7. Naga Ram Meena S/o Shri Kishan Lal Meena, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Village Chappar Colony Khandar Sawaimadhopur District Sawaimadhopur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan 2. Director, Elementary Education, Bikaner. 3. The District Education Officer, (Elementary Education) Bundi, Rajasthan 4. The District Education Officer, (Elementary Education) Alwar, Rajasthan 5. The District Education Officer, (Elementary Education) Kota, Rajasthan 6. The District Education Officer, (Elementary Education) Sawaimadhopur, Rajasthan [2025:RJ-JP:47317] (2 of 4) [CW-17885/2025] ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sukhraj Singh Rathore For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.S. Naruka, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 21/11/2025 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioners with following prayer: A. By an appropriate writ, order or direction, the respondents may kindly be directed to grant all notional benefits for the post of Teacher Grade- III, treating them as per with the candidates how had been afforded appointment in the year 2005 and may kindly directed to grant the petitioners notional benefit w.e.f. year 2005. B. By an appropriate writ, order or direction, the respondents may kindly be directed to give all notional benefits, Seniority Benefits and other service benefits for the post of Teacher Grade-Ill w.e.f. the year 2005 as similar situated candidates given the appointment in pursuance of the advertisement, 2004 w.e.f. the date of actual joining orders with all consequential benefits. C. By an appropriate writ order or direction, the respondents may kindly be directed to grant the benefits like seniority, fixation and notional benefits in the pursuance of the case of Nand Kishor Vyas passed by the Hon'ble High Court w.e.f. the year 2019 as given to the similarly situated candidates participated in the same selection process and actual benefits from [2025:RJ-JP:47317] (3 of 4) [CW-17885/2025] initially date of joining on the post of Teacher Grade III. D. By an appropriate writ, order or direction, the respondents may kindly be directed to grant the entire benefits including the prevailing interest to the petitioners as per the Hon'ble High Court orders. E. Any other appropriate writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioners. F. Writ petition filed by the petitioners may kindly be allowed with costs. 2. Learned counsel for petitioners while referring and relying upon judgment dated 08.09.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.16535/2025 titled as Hari Ram Meena and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur on basis of ratio laid down in case of Nand Kishore Sharma & Ors. Vs. The State of Rajasthan & Ors.: S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12109/2018 decided on 18.07.2018 by a Co- ordinate Bench of this Court. He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order. 3. Mr. S.S. Naruka, AAG accepts notice for respondent(s). 4. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioners and also material placed on record, the writ petition is disposed of in light of Hari Ram Meena and Ors. [2025:RJ-JP:47317] (4 of 4) [CW-17885/2025] Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra) passed by this Court. 5. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case referred hereinabove, but in case of deviation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 6. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /109