CWP-10611-2025 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-10611-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 22.04.2025 ILD Millennium Private Limited .....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN Present: Mr. Tushar Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Ankur Mittal, Addl.A.G., Haryana, and Mr. Gaurav Bansal, DAG, Haryana. *** SUDHIR SINGH (ORAL) By way of the present writ petition, the petitioner- company has sought issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of Mandamus directing respondent No.2-HRERA to decide the application dated 08.08.2024 (Annexure P-7) filed by the stakeholders jointly, for extension of time in respect of the resolution plan, in accordance with law. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after filing of the aforesaid application dated 08.08.2024 (Annexure P-7), a period of more than eight months has already elapsed, but no action has been taken thereon till date by the concerned authorities. He further submits that the petitioner AJAY PRASHER 2025.04.28 12:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-10611-2025 (O&M) -2- would be satisfied, if the respondent authorities are directed to deal with its concerns/grievances and pass appropriate order on the said representation. 3. Without commenting on merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2-HRERA (competent authority), to look into the pending application dated 08.08.2024 (Annexure P-7) and pass an appropriate reasoned order thereon, in accordance with law, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy/production of this order. 4. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SUDHIR SINGH) JUDGE (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE 22.04.2025 Ajay Prasher Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No AJAY PRASHER 2025.04.28 12:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document