Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45962 (AP)

Osuri Sita Rama Lakshmi, v. State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/23244/2022 · 2025-05-01

T C D Sekhar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 23244 OF 2022 Between; Osuri Sita Rama Lakshmi, W/o. Late Radha Phanikar, Aged 58 years, Occ- House wife, R/o. H.No. 11-4-37/A, Peechupalem, Narasapuram, West Godavari District. ...Petitioner AND 1. State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, 4th Block, Ground Floor, A.P Secretariat buildings, Amaravathi. Velagapudi, Guntur District 2. The District Collector, West Godavari District, Bhimavaram (Formerly Eluru) 3. The Sub-Collector, Narasapuram Division, Narasapuram Godavari District. 4. The Tahsildar, Narasapuram Mandal, West Godavari District. 5. The Mandal Surveyor, Narasapuram Mandal, West Godavari District. 6. The Deputy Tahsildar, Narasa.purarn Mandal, West Godavari District. 7. The Revenue Inspector, Nafasapuram Mandal, West Godavari District. 8. The Village Revenue Officer, Narasapuram Village, Narasapuram Mandal, West Godavari District. 9. The Sub-Registrar, Office of SRO Narasapuram, Narasapuram, West Godavari District. Kandula Baji Satyanarayana, Deputy Tahsildar, Narasapuram Mandal, West Godavari District. West 10. 11. Vijaya Sekhar, Revenue Inspector, Narasapuram Mandal, West Godavari District. Melam Chiranjeevi Satish, Village Revenue Officer, Narasapuram Village, Narasapuram Mandal, West Godavari District. 12. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or order more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the 4**^ respondent in changing the entries in the revenue records, in collusion with the Respondents 10 to 12 who are subordinate officers, with respect to the land in R.S.No. 95/3 to an extent of Ac. 0-76 cents, R.S.No. 94-1C-1 to an extent of Ac. 2-42 cents, R.S.No. 69-6B to an extent of Ac. 0-42 cents, R.S.No. 69- 1C to an extent of Ac. 0-56 cents total an extent of Ac. 4-16 cents situated at Narasapuram Village, Narasapuram Mandal, West Godavari District and also initiating steps to conduct survey in R.S.No. 95/3, R.S.No. 94-1 C-1, R.S.No. 69-6B, R.S.No. 69-1 Cin the name of some unknown person even though nobody have any single inch of land in R.S.No. 95/3, R.S.No. 94-1C- 1, R.S.No. 69-6B, R.S.No. 69-1C is illegal and arbitrary and violative of Article 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution and violation of the provisions of A.P Rights in Lands and Pattadar passbooks Act, 1971 and Rules, 1974 and AP Survey and Boundaries Act, 1923 and consequently direct the respondent authorities to restore the petitioner's/petitioner's husband name in entries in the revenue records pertaining to in R.S.No. 95/3 to an extent of Ac. 0-76 cents, R.S.No. 94-1 C-1 to an extent of Ac. 2-42 cents, R.S.No. 69- 6B to an extent of Ac. 0-42 cents, R.S.No. 69-1C to an extent of Ac. 0-56 cents total an extent of Ac. 4-16 cents situated at Narasapuram Village, Narasapuram Mandal, West Godavari District. lA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the changes made by the 4*^ Respondent in the entries in revenue records with regard to the petitioner's land in R.S.No. 95/3 to an extent of Ac. 0-76 cents, R.S.No. 94-1C-1 to an extent of Ac. 2-42 cents, R.S.No. 69-6B to an extent of Ac. 0-42 cents, R.S.No. 69-1C to an extent of Ac. 0-56 cents total an extent of Ac. 4-16 cents situated at Narasapuram Village, Narasapuram Mandal, West Godavari District while directing the respondents not to give any kind of affect to the said changes including alienation, creating third party interests or issue of Passbook cum Title deed. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI. RAMBABU KOPPINEEDI Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: f APHC010380332022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] FRIDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 23244/2022 Between: Osuri Sita Rama Lakshmi ...PETITIONER AND State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.RAMBABU KOPPINEEDI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE •J* The Court made the following order: The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks 1. permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition, with a liberty to file a fresh writ petition. Request of the petitioner is accepted. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn reserving liberty to the petitioner to file fresh writ 3. petition. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. SD/- A. VENUGOPALA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SE(^X^^FFICER To, 1. One CC to SRI. RAMBABU KOPPINEEDI Advocate [OPUC] 2. TwoCCsto GP FOR REVENUE ,High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 3. Three CD Copies ksr HIGH COURT DATED:02/05/2025 ORDER WP.No.23244 of 2022 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS AS WITHDRAWN