Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45961 (AP)

Nagam Kanakeswara Rao v. The State of Andra Pradesh

WP/10113/2021 · 2025-10-07

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010181442021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 10113/2021 Between: 1. NAGAM KANAKESWARA RAO, 5/O VENKATRAO 0CC PRIVATE EMPLOYEE, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARRS R/6 DR NO. 38-30-73/6 SAI NAGAR, 8TH LINE, MARRIPALEM, VISALKAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS AMARAVATI. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, KAKINADA 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, GOLLAPROLU, POLICE STATION,EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. REDDAM SUVARNA VANI, ALIAS VANI, W/O NAGAM KANAKESWARA RAO AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS R/O CHALLULA DHIBBA, RAMALAYAM STREET NEAR RAILWAY STATION, GOLLAPROLU VILLAGE, AND MANDAL, EASTGODAVARI DIST. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. BOKKA SATYANARAYANA KAMLA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 2 1. GP FOR HOME 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 10113 of 2021 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declaring the action of the part of the respondents 2 and 3 here in even without taking any steps to refer the matter to conduct the counseling through district legal services authority headed by the district judge East Godavari District or before the mediation and consolation centre located at111_ the premises of honorable high court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati for conduct the counseling between the petitioner and the 4th respondent registered the FIR no. 16/2020 Dt. 10.08.2020 is illegal arbitrary and violative of the article 14,19, and 21 of the constitution of India apart from .. contrary to the several judgments of the Apex court and consequentially seeking a direction from this honorable court to refer the matter before the mediation and consolation centre located at the premises of honorable high court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati or the legal services authority headed by the district judge of East Godavari District for conduct the counseling between the petitioner and 4th respondent to lead marital life and to pass.…” 2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petition may be disposed of, since the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents is in attendance. 4 4. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 08.10.2025. UPS 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.10113 of 2021 Dated.08.10.2025 UPS 146