Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
24.01.2025 Item No.119 PG Ct. No.7 W.P.A. 26806 of 2022 Tamanna Parvin. Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Pinaki Dhole Mr. Avishek Prasad………for the State Mr. Kazi Sajjad Alam Mr. Mainul Thander………for the respondent no. 8
1. Learned advocate for the respondent no. 8 files a letter addressed to the learned advocate for the petitioner dated November 19, 2024. On November 19, 2024, the petitioner was not represented and the hearing of the writ petition stood adjourned.
2. In spite of notice, none appears for the petitioner even today. The learned advocate appearing for the private respondent prays for dismissal of the writ petition.
3. State is represented by its learned advocate.
4. It seems that the petitioner has lost interest in proceeding with the matter. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed for default.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be furnished to the parties expeditiously upon compliance of all legal formalities.
(HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.)