APHC010593902022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 35816/2022 Between: 1. VARADAM JANARDHANA, S/O (LATE) VENKATRAMAIAH, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, RETIRED B.P.M. OF SOMALA, R/O DOOR NO.5-4-1, BAZAR STREET ,SOMALA, SOMALA POST AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2. VARADAM VENKATRAMANA, S/O (LATE) VENKATRAMAIAH, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, R/O DOOR NO.5-4-1, SOMALA, SOMALA POST AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, , REP BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME AFFAIRS, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, CHITTOOR. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, SOMALA POLICE STATION, SOMALA, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. P MALLIKARJUNA, S/O LATE P.RAMAIAH HINDU, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, CULTIVATION, R/O DOOR NO.7-47, HARIJANAWADA, SOMALA TOWN AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. M CHANDRAIAH, S/O (LATE) M. PAPAIAH, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, CULTIVATION, R/AT DOOR NO.7-61, SOMALA TOWN AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 6. C GOVINDAIAH, S/O (LATE) C.LAKSHMAIAH, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, CULTIVATION, DOOR NO.7-88, HARIJANAWADA, SOMALA TOWN AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. A SYAM SUNDAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the 3rd Respondent in providing Police aid to the Petitioners for effective implementation of the Judgment and Decree dt.05-07-2022 in O.S.No.292/2019 on the file of Hon’ble Principal Junior Civil Judge, Punganur, is illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the principles of natural justice, violative of fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 19 86 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd Respondent to provide Police aid to the Petitioners for effective implementation of the Judgment and Decree dt.05-07-2022 in O.S.No.292/2019 on the file of Hon’ble Principal Junior Civil Judge, Punganur.” 2. Sri A.Syam Sundar Reddy, learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that they filed a Civil Suit in O.S.No.292 of 2019 on the file of the Court of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Punganur and obtained judgment and decree of permanent injunction in their favour, but the defendants therein, who remained ex parte in the said suit, are threatening to dispossess the Petitioners from the subject property. 3. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, would submit that the Respondent – Police have not received any representation from the Petitioners seeking police protection. 4. Recording the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, in the light of the decree and judgment passed in O.S.No.292 of 2019 on the file of the Court of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Punganur, the Petitioners are at liberty to make fresh representation to the Police as and when required and on filing such representation, the Police make take 3 appropriate measures according to the governing Rules and Law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:19.11.2025 Dinesh 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.35816 of 2022 Dt.19.11.2025 Dinesh