APHC010034162025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 1962/2025 Between: M Amajula Vani ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SURESH KUMAR REDDY KALAVA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed for the following relief: “to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of the writ of MANDAMUS declaring the action of the Respondents herein particularly Respondent Nos 3 to 5 in highhandedly interfering with the civil disputes and peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners property of an extent of Ac 502 cents situated at Sy No 2 338/6 of 102E Ramireddygaripalli Village Pulicherla Mandal Chittoor District on the ascendancy of the Respondent No 6 herein without having any power or authority or any jurisdiction and threatening to vacate the possession is questioned as the same is arbitrary illegal contrary to the well established legal principles apart from being violative of fundamental and constitutional rights guaranteed under articles 14 19 21 and 300 A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents not to interfere in petitioner s civil disputes regarding the above subject property of an extent of Ac 502 cents situated at Sy No 338/6 of 102E Ramireddygaripalli Village Pulicherla Mandal Chittoor District forthwith and pass such...” 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the State. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the respondents are interfering with the civil dispute between the petitioner and the unofficial respondent No.6. 4. Learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the State on instructions would submit that respondent/Police will not interfere with the civil dispute between the parties and especially with reference to the petitioner’s property. 3 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the considered opinion that the Writ Petition can be disposed of at the stage of admission itself, without going into merits by directing the respondent No.4 to follow due procedure established under law, if they intend to call the petitioner to the Police Station, in connection with any crime or enquiry. 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. _______________________ ___ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI Dated: 28.01.2025 PSA 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 1962 of 2025 Date: 28.01.2025 PSA