SRI SAI KRISHNA FASHION TEXTILES v. SRI A PATALAPPA
WP/58145/2015 · 2025-11-24
Jyoti M
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45948 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45948 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48395 WP No. 58145 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 58145 OF 2015 (L-RES)
BETWEEN:
SRI. SAI KRISHNA FASHION TEXTILES PVT.LTD., NO.58, MAJRA HOSAHALLI, KASBA HOBLI, DODDABALLAPUR-561202 BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR MR. K.C.SUBRAMANI RAJU, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, S/O. CHENGAMANADADDI ...PETITIONER (ABSENT)
AND:
1. SRI. A.PATALAPPA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, S/O. ANJINAPPA, R/AT DODDA TUMKUR POST, DODDABALLAPUR TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-561202. 2. SRI. MANJUNATHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, S/O. NARAYANASWAMY, R/O. SUNKADAKATTE, ALURUDUDDAHALLI POST, DEVANAHALLI TALUK-562110 BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT
Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48395 WP No. 58145 of 2015
3. A) SRI. MURTHY P., SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS. SRI. PATALAPPA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,
B) SMT.PUTTAMMA, W/O. PATALAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
BOTH ARE RESIDENTS OF T.AGRAHARA VILLAGE, JALA HOLBI, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-560013. 5. SRI. ADINARAYANA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, S/O. VEERANNA, R/O. BYRAPURA, TIPPUR POST, DODDABALLAPURA-561202. 6. SRI. NARENDRA N., AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, S/O. LATE B.NARAYANAPPA, R/O. AARADESH HALLI, KUNDANAHALLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562110. 7. SRI. A.PRAKASH, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, S/O. ANJINAPPA, R/O. AARADESH HALLI, KUNDANAHALLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562110. 8. THE MANAGEMENT OF FUSION APPARELS PVT.LTD., NO.58, MAJRA HOSAHALLI,
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48395 WP No. 58145 of 2015
KASBA HOBLI, DODDABALLAPUR-561202. BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR MR.M.DHANANJAYA ...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.RAGHU, ADVOCATE FOR R1, R2 & R3(A) AND R4 AND R6;
R3(B) SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED;
VIDE ORDER DATED 14.02.2017, PETITION AS AGAINST R7 IS DISMISSED)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER The name of the petitioner is called out thrice in the open court. There is no representation, either through video conferencing or in person. This court vide order dated 17.11.2025 permitted Mr.S.B.Mukkannappa., to retire from the case and directed the office to print the petitioner’s name in the cause list. The petitioner’s name is printed in the cause list. As already noted above, when the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48395 WP No. 58145 of 2015
Resultantly, the writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Because of dismissal of Writ Petition, pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of and interim relief if any stands discharged. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE KMV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 54.1