[2025:RJ-JP:47472] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15263/2025 Manish @ Bhola S/o Jagdish, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Ghana Ka Pura, Rajakhera, Police Station Rajakhera, Dholpur. (At Present Confined In District Jail, Dholpur, Raj) ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15264/2025 Ranjit @ Chote S/o Ramnarayan, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Nayla, Rajakhera, Police Station Rajakhera, Dholpur. (At Present Confined In District Jail, Dholpur, Raj.) ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tekchand Swami Mr. Rajesh Kala Mr. Harshit Sharma For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 24/11/2025 1. The instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicants. The accused-applicants were arrested in connection with FIR No. 120/2024 registered at Police Station Rajkhera District Dholpur for the offence(s) under Sections 143, 323, 341, 452, 379, 504, 506, 336 of IPC. [2025:RJ-JP:47472] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-15263/2025] 2. Learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that applicants are young persons, aged in between 26-27 years. It is further submitted that based on the same facts and circumstances, seven co-accused have already been released on bail and parity should be maintained. It is also submitted that applicants are behind bars ever-since 12.11.2025. 3. Upon perusal of the case record, it has been observed that on the earlier occasion, anticipatory bail applications filed by the instant applicants were duly considered by this Court and the applicants therein was directed to surrender and apply for the regular bail. However, the learned Trial Court has rejected the regular bail applications moved by the present applicants, primarily on the ground of criminal antecedents of similar nature registered against the applicants, which are eleven in number. 4. Having heard the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties and taking note of the fact that there are as many as eleven criminal antecedents registered against the applicants; that case of the co-accused is distinguishable from the present applicants and looking to the overall facts and record of the instant case, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the accused- applicants on bail at this stage. 5. Accordingly, the instant bail applications are dismissed at this stage. 6. A copy of this order be placed in the connected application. (SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK/218-219