COCP-1337 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 210 Amritsar Plywood through its partner Sh. Amarjit Singh Gurjit Singh and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) 1. disobedience a co-ordinate Plywood through its partner Sh. Amarjit Singh 2. the case having been called twice. 3. respondents that the present contempt petition has been rendered infructuous as, the ‘Amritsar Plywood through its partner Sh. Amarjit Singh others’, in which contempt was passed has been dismissed as withdrawn by a Bench of this Court vide order dated 02.05.2025. 4. by learned counsel for the resp 1337-2021 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP Date of Decision: 08.09.2025 Amritsar Plywood through its partner Sh. Amarjit Singh Versus Gurjit Singh and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA None for the petitioner. Mr. TVS Lehal, Advocate for the respondents. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been filed alleging willful ce of interim order dated 12.04.2019 ordinate Bench of this Court in CWP- Plywood through its partner Sh. Amarjit Singh There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, despite the case having been called twice. At the very outset, it is submitted by learned counsel for the respondents that the present contempt petition has been rendered uous as, the main writ petition bearing Amritsar Plywood through its partner Sh. Amarjit Singh , in which interim order dated 12.04.2019 (Annexure P contempt was passed has been dismissed as withdrawn by a Bench of this Court vide order dated 02.05.2025. A copy of the order dated 02.05.2025 by learned counsel for the respondents is taken on record. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-1337-2021 (O&M) Date of Decision: 08.09.2025 Amritsar Plywood through its partner Sh. Amarjit Singh .… Petitioner .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. TVS Lehal, Advocate for the respondents. The present petition has been filed alleging willful 12.04.2019 (Annexure P-1) passed by -10133-2019 titled as ‘Amritsar Plywood through its partner Sh. Amarjit Singh vs. PSPCL and others’. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, despite At the very outset, it is submitted by learned counsel for the respondents that the present contempt petition has been rendered main writ petition bearing CWP-10133-2019, titled as Amritsar Plywood through its partner Sh. Amarjit Singh vs. PSPCL and order dated 12.04.2019 (Annexure P-1) under contempt was passed has been dismissed as withdrawn by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 02.05.2025. 02.05.2025 handed over in Court ondents is taken on record. The present petition has been filed alleging willful passed by Amritsar There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, despite At the very outset, it is submitted by learned counsel for the respondents that the present contempt petition has been rendered titled as SPCL and 1) under ordinate handed over in Court RISHU KATARIA 2025.09.09 18:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. COCP-1337 5. passed in the present petition, the same stands been rendered infructuous 6. contempt petition in case any cause of action survives in its favour within a period of 04 weeks from today 7. 8. 08.09.2025 rishu 1337-2021 (O&M) -2- In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition, the same stands been rendered infructuous. The petitioner would be at liberty to contempt petition in case any cause of action survives in its favour within a period of 04 weeks from today, as per law. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. 08.09.2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition, the same stands disposed of, as having The petitioner would be at liberty to revive the present contempt petition in case any cause of action survives in its favour within law. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No In view of the above, no further orders are required to be as having revive the present contempt petition in case any cause of action survives in its favour within RISHU KATARIA 2025.09.09 18:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.