Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4594 (GAU)

Jumi Riram and 5 Ors v. Jumya Riram and 2 Ors

Cont.Cas(C)/16/2024 · 2025-02-02

Sanjay Kumar Medhi

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC040007972024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/16/2024 Jumi Riram and 5 Ors Sago Village, PO and PS Basar, Leparada District, Arunachal Pradesh 2: Mijum Riram Age: Occupation : Sago Village PO and PS Basar Leparada District Arunachal Pradesh 3: Karmar Riram Age: Occupation : Sago Village PO and PS Basar Leparada District Arunachal Pradesh 4: Mirik Riram Age: Occupation : Sago Village PO and PS Basar Leparada District Arunachal Pradesh 5: Minli Riram Age: Occupation : Sago Village PO and PS Basar Leparada District Page No.# 2/3 Arunachal Pradesh 6: Maryom Riram GB Age: Occupation : Eshi Chiku Village PO and PS Basar Leparada District Arunachal Prades VERSUS Jumya Riram and 2 Ors Sago Village, PO and PS Basar, Leparada District, Arunachal Pradesh 2:Dojum Riram Age: 0 Occupation : Sago Village PO and PS Basar Leparada District Arunachal Pradesh 3:Jumkar Riram Age: 0 Occupation : Sago Village PO and PS Basar Leparada District Arunachal Prades Advocate for the Petitioner : Romjir Rakshap, Advocate for the Respondent : Lissing Perme, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.K.MEDHI ORDER Date : 03-02-2025 Heard Shri R. Rakshap, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Shri S. Yirang, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Shri L. Perme, learned counsel Page No.# 3/3 for the respondents. Shri Rakshap, the learned counsel has submitted that due to subsequent development, the matter has been settled amicably between the parties and therefore, he would not like to pursue with this contempt petition. In view of the aforesaid submission, the contempt petition stands closed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant