APHC010175702025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 9017/2025 Between: 1. MADHU SURIBABU, S/O MADHU SIMHACHALAM, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, R/O- H.NO. 2-93, YANDADA, NEAR RAMALAYAM TEMPLE VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENTDEPARTMENT, PRIME HILLS CREST, 4TH FLOOR, NEAR DGP OFFICE, BESIDE ULTRATECH READY MIX PLANT, VADDESAWARAM VILLAGE, MANGALAGIRI, ANDHRA PRADESH- 522501 2. THE GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER, GVMC OFFICE, VISAKHAPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE ZONAL COMMISSIONER, GVMC, VISAKHAPATNAM-2, ANDHRA PRADESH 4. THE SUBREGISTRAR, MADHURAWADA, VISAKHAPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH 5. K P ESTATES, ( PAN NO.ABBFK7592H), REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, SRI.POLAMARASETTYKUSHVANTH, R/O- FLAT NO.401, FOURTH FLOOR, KPN SENATE BUILDING, GVMC EAST SHIRDI SAI BABA PARK, EAST POINT COLONY, 2 VISAKHAPATNAM-530017 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to pass an order, writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of Respondents 2 and 3 in not disposing my representation dated 17-03-2025 and entertaining the application of Building plan approval as illegal, arbitrary malafide and against the Constitutional guarantees more particularly violative of Article 300A of the Constitution of India and to consequently to restrain Respondent No.2 and Respondent No.3 from entertaining the Building plan approval without disposing the Representation dt 17.03.2025 in the interests of justice and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondent No.2 and Respondent No.3 to not entertain or grant Building permission approval in the subject matter land without disposing the Representation dated 17-03-2025 made by the Petitioner herein in accordance with law and pending adjudication of the main Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. UMESH CHANDRA P V G Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. P DURGA PRASAD 2. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS 3. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP The Court made the following: 3 ORDER:- The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 02.12.2025 SCH 4 53 HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N Writ Petition No.9017 of 2025 Date: 02.12.2025 SCH