ARVIND GAUTAM @ CHAMAN S/O SHRI GOVIND SHARMA @ BAL GOVIND v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/4906/2022 · 2025-11-26
Anoop Kumar Dhand
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45935 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45935 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:48066] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 4906/2022 Arvind Gautam @ Chaman S/o Shri Govind Sharma @ Bal Govind, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Gokul Sadan Purana Bazar, Diggi, Ps. Diggi, District Tonk. At Present Housing Board House No. 198, Opposite Bus Stand Tonk. At Present Director Credence Buildcom India Ltd., 30 Satya Vihar, Tonk Road, P.s. Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
2. Arunendra Bhatiya S/o Shri T.d. Bhatiya, R/o 133-B, Barkat Nagar, Jaipur.
3. Mamta W/o Yashwant Singh, R/o Plot No. 13, Prem Nagar, Gurjar Ki Thadi, New Sanganer Road, Jaipur
4. Seema W/o Narsingh, R/o Plot No. 30, Kotputli Colony, Bhawani Singh Road, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
5. Harikishan Mayur S/o Shri Ramnarayan, R/o Plot No. 89, Shivad Area, Bapu Nagar, Jaipur.
6. Rakesh S/o Sher Singh, R/o Vilalge Alton Post Baroli, Reari, Haryana
7. Suresh Kumar S/o Atar Singh, R/o House No. 16, Village Tihada, Bawal, Reari, Haryana.
8. Dharmpal S/o Shri Jaswant Singh, R/o V.p.o. Saharanawas, Tehsil District Rewari.
9. Jang Bahadur S/o Shri Sheodan Singh, R/o Jaswant Nagar Ward No. 25, Kutumbar District Rewari, Haryana. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 26/11/2025
[2025:RJ-JP:48066] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-4906/2022]
1. This petition is lying pending before this Court in defect side for last several years and no steps have been taken by the counsel for the petitioner to cure the defect(s).
2. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this matter and he has lost interest in pursuing this matter.
3. In view of the above, the instant criminal misc. petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution. The stay application and all pending applications, if any, also stand dismissed.
4. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to move application for revival of this petition, in case, any cause of action or grievance still survives.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/272