1 APHC010209342021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 12004/2021 Between: 1. N.JAYA LAKHMI, W/O P.SRI HARI BABU, AGED- 48 YEARS, OCC- ADVOCATE, R/O 12-222, I CROSS, SAI NAGAR, ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, II TOWN POLICE STATION, ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT 4. JAKIR HUSSAIN, S/O FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER CIRCLE INSPECTOR, II TOWN POLICE STATION, ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT 5. RAM PRASAD, S/O FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER SUB INSPECTOR, II TOWN POLICE STATION, ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT 6. ALLA BAKASH, S/O FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER SUB INSPECTOR, II TOWN POLICE STATION, ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT 7. VANNURAPPA, S/O FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER POLICE CONSTABLE, II TOWN POLICE STATION, ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N CHANDRA SEKHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: 2 “.... to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action on the part of Respondents 3 to 6 in calling Petitioner there by directing her to leave the territorial limits of Anantapur Municipal Corporation if she has not complied to their demands of resolving her financial disputes with persons with whom she has got financial issues as illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the Respondents 3 to 6 to not to interfere with legal activities of Petitioner, further direct the Respondent no.2 to initiate necessary departmental proceedings against Respondents 4 to 7 for the misusing their official position.” 2. Today, when the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that nothing survives for adjudication in the Writ Petition and the matter has become infructuous. 3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________ Dr.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 23.09.2025 Asr 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.12004 of 2021 Dt.23.09.2025 Asr