HARPHOOL SINGH JAAT (DIED DURING TRIAL) S/O LATE SHRI BADRIPRASAD JAT (FATHER) v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLW/638/2019 · 2025-11-13
Anand Sharma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45931 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45931 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:45656] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 638/2019
1. Harphool Singh Jaat (Died During Trial) through LRs S/o Late Shri Badriprasad Jat (Father), and Smt. Gyani Devi (Mother), R/o Ward No.6 Gram Chharsa Tehsil Shahpura Dist. Jaipur Rajasthan.
2. Smt. Premdevi W/o Late Shri Harphool Singh Jat, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Ward No 6 Gram Chharsa Tehsil Shahpura Dist. Jaipur-303120 (Raj., Bharat)
3. Vinod Choudhary S/o Late Shri Harphool Singh Jat, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Ward No 6 Gram Chharsa Tehsil Shahpura Dist. Jaipur-303120 (Raj., Bharat)
4. Rakesh Choudhary S/o Late Shri Harphool Singh Jat, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Ward No 6 Gram Chharsa Tehsil Shahpura Dist. Jaipur-303120 (Raj., Bharat) ----Petitioners Versus
1. State of Rajasthan through P.P.
2. S.H.O. P.S. Jalupura Jaipur (South) through P.P.
3. Education Department Govt. of Rajasthan, Jaipur (Raj. Bharat) through Secretary.
4. Shri Indrapal Khullar, Aged About 90 Years, (The Then Dist. Education Officer (Primary Education) Govt. Of Raj. Jaipur) S/o Late Shri Radhuram Khullar at Present 39-A Jawahar Nagar Colony Jaipur (Raj. Bharat) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Lalitendra Bhardwaj For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 13/11/2025
1. This petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following relief:
[2025:RJ-JP:45656] (2 of 2) [CRLW-638/2019]
"vr% ,dyihB nkf.Md fjV&;kfpdk lknj&lfou; izLrqr dj fuosnu gS fd fouez ;kfpdkdrkZ }kjk izLrqr fjV&;kfpdk Lohdkj Qjekdj%& 1- ekStwnk&izdj.k esa esa fouez ;kfpdkdrkZ ¼Øe&1½ Jh gjQwy flag tkV ds f[kykQ izLrqr fof/klEer tkap&foghu fujk/kkj vkjksi i= fnukafdr 19-01-2001 ¼"Annexure-3"½ ,oa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky;&ekrgr
¼ACMM&2]
t;iqj egkuxj½ }kjk ikfjr fu.kZ;kns'k fnuakfdr 25-08- 2009 ¼"Annexure-4"½ ,oa fojfpr vkjksi ¼"Annexure-5"½ ckn&lywd&dkuwuh vikLr Qjekdj fouez ;kfpdkdrkZ ¼Øe&1½ dks fof/kd rkSj ij funksZ"k ?kksf"kr djus dk lqLi"V vkns'k ikfjr djus dh d`ik djsa] rFkk 2- vU; vuqrks"k] tks ekStwnk&izdj.k esa ekuuh; U;k;ky;&gktk Jheku fouez ;kfpdkdrkZ ds fgr esa U;k;ksfpr le>s] U;k;fgr esa fouez ;kfpdkdrkZ dks iznku djus dh d`ik djsaA "
2. It is submitted that during the pendency of the petition, the learned trial Court has decided the matter finally on
31.10.2022. Copy of the judgment has also been placed on record.
3. In view of the above, the present writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
4. However, the petitioners are at liberty to take appropriate remedy as available under the law.
(ANAND SHARMA),J DAKSH/48