[2025:RJ-JP:43811-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition (PIL) No. 12900/2025 1. Khemchand Meena S/o Sampatram Meena, Aged About 52 Years, R/o Village Kayampur, Norangwada, Tehsil Mahwa, District Dausa. 2. Udaychand Meena S/o Ramjilal Meena, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Village Kayampur, Norangwada, Tehsil Mahwa, District Dausa. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The District Collector, (Chairman PLPC), District Dausa (Raj.). 3. The Sub Divisional Officer, Tehsil Mahwa, District Dausa (Raj.). 4. The Tehsildar, Tehsil Mahwa, District Dausa (Raj.). 5. Girraj, S/o Devpal 6. Chandulal, S/o Bhaglya 7. Manjulal, S/o Bhaglya 8. Kamal, S/o Surendra 9. Laxman, S/o Hazari 10. Virendra, S/o Ramsahay 11. Jagmohan, S/o Mishrilal 12. Bhaglya, S/o Harful 13. Somotya, S/o Kanhaiya 14. Ramsahay, S/o Dhoklya 15. Sumrat, S/o Umrao 16. Battu, S/o Jaylal 17. Moharpal, S/o Khairati 18. Banwari, S/o Ranglal 19. Prahlad, S/o Mulchand 20. Vishambhar, S/o Harikishan 21. Buddhram, S/o Bhaglya 22. Ramswrup, S/o Kanhaiya [2025:RJ-JP:43811-DB] (2 of 3) [CW-12900/2025] 23. Chhelbihari, S/o Navalkishore 24. Mukesh, S/o Gangasahay 25. Kishore, S/o Chhotya 26. Gopisahay, S/o Girraj 27. Dayaram, S/o Umrao 28. Vishram, S/o Jaylal 29. Bhagchand, S/o Jaylal 30. Kailash, S/o Khairati 31. Prahlad, S/o Moolchand 32. Banwari, S/o Ranglal 33. Bhambhu, S/o Chhotya 34. Buddhram, S/o Kanhaiya 35. Mannaram, S/o Ratanlal 36. Shriram, S/o Ratanlal 37. Gangasahay, S/o Ratanlal 38. Ramsahay S/o Dhonklya, (Respondents 5 to 38 All R/o Village Kayampur, Tehsil Mahwa, District Dausa). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Umesh Vyas For Respondent(s) : Mr. G.S. Gill, AAG assisted by Ms. Shikha Sharma, AAAG HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA Order 01/11/2025 1. We find that the allegation in the present petition is personal and the petition is not through pro bono, as it is for the purpose of opening of a way. 2. The provision under the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act provides for an appropriate forum to raise the grievance regarding [2025:RJ-JP:43811-DB] (3 of 3) [CW-12900/2025] opening of the way, which the petitioners are always free to undertake. 3. Granting liberty, the present Civil Writ Petition is dismissed as not being a case of Public Interest Litigation. (SANDEEP TANEJA),J (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),ACTING CJ AMIT/11