APHC010058212019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 2642/2019 Between: 1. SUBBA RAO THUMMALA, S/O. SATYANARAYANA THUMMALA, AGE 43YEARS, 6TH LANE, J K C COLLEGE ROAD, GUNTUR, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE PASS PORT OFFICER, REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICE, MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS, VIJAYAWADA 2. THE PASSPORT OFFICER, REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICE, MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS, NEAR P.F OFFICE, BESIDE RYTHU BAZAR, MARRIPALEM VUDA LAYOUT, N A D POST, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not renewing/reissuing the passport of the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents authorities to renew/reissue the passport for the passport No. G4991161 of the petitioner and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the application of the petitioner to renew/reissue the passport No.G4991161 of the petitioner pending disposal of the Writ Petition, pending disposal of the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. BRAHMA REDDYVATTIJANNALA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA The Court made the following ORDER: No representation for the petitioner. On the earlier occasions also i.e., on 20.08.2025 and 28.08.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption “for dismissal”. Even today there is no representation for the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the case. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for default. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 10.09.2025 KAS