Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45918 (CAL)

SNIGDHA DAS MANDAL v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS

WP.ST/195/2019 · 2025-02-05

Madhuresh Prasad, Supratim Bhattacharya

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Ct. No.4 D/L-2 02.04.2025 (Naba) W.P.S.T. 195 of 2019 With CAN 1 of 2022 CAN 2 of 2025 Singdha Das Mandal Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Ms. Munmun Tewary, Ms. Sanchayita De, Mr. Gourav Sarkar ...on behalf of the Petitioner Mr. Tapan Kumar Mukherjee, ld. AGP, Mr. Somnath Naskar ...for the State Respondents Re: CAN 2 of 2025 1. We are informed that CAN application for restoration has been filed by a learned advocate who was not the advocate-on-record when the matter was dismissed in default. 2. The application has been filed by filing a Vakalatnama without a No Objection Certificate of the earlier learned advocate. 3. In the above circumstances, we leave it open to the petitioner and the present learned advocate to take appropriate steps in the matter. 4. List the matter on 30th April, 2025 under the appropriate heading. (Madhuresh Prasad, J.) (Supratim Bhattacharya, J.)