APHC010421742002 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 22152/2002 Between: 1. B VENKATA RAMANA, S/O. SAVADAIAH TYPIST A.P.RESIDENTIAL SCHOOL FOR GIRLS, KAMMANAPALLI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2. B. PATTABHI REDDY, S/O. NARAYANA REDDY JUNIOR ASSISTANT A.P.RESIDENTIAL SCHOOL FOR BOYS GYRAMPALLY, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. A P RESIDENTIAL EDUCATION, INSTITUTIONA'SOCIETY[REGD] GAGANVIHAR, M.J. ROAD, HYDERABAD 2. THE VICECHAIRMAN A P RESIDENTIAL, EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS SOCIETY [REGD] AND SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, SCHOOL EDUCATION, SECRETARIAT HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to declare the action of the respondents in continuing the UDCs who belongs to other Zones in Zone IV is illegal, violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and Presidential order and in consequence thereof to direct the Respondents to consider the cases of the petitioners for promotion as UDCs, as the petitioners are fully and qualified persons by implementing 2 the Presidential Order, by issuing a writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other writ, order or directions. IA NO: 1 OF 2002(WPMP 22152 OF 2002 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the cases of the petitioners for promotion as UDCs by disposing of their representations dt 2.9.2002,pending final disposal of the main writ petition. IA NO: 2 OF 2002(WPMP 27771 OF 2002 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the cases of the petitioners for promotion as UDCs by disposing of their representations dated 2.9.2002. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. V V NARASIMHA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. M ANITHA 3 The Court made the following order: Though the matter is listed today under the caption ‘For Dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. On earlier occasions also i.e., on 28.08.2025, 31.07.2025 and 07.07.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners. It shows that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting their case. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous applications are closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 25.09.2025 MP 4 184 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO:22152 of 2002 Date: 25.09.2025 MP