Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45917 (AP)

M/s Surya Venkata Ramana Traders, Pvt. Ltd, v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/25269/2025 · 2025-09-22

Kiranmayee Mandava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010481372025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NOs: 25266 & 25269 of 2025 WRIT PETITION NO: 25266/2025 Between: 1. SURYA VENKATA RAMANA TRADERS PVT LTD, MANAGING PARTNER, REP BY SEETHA VENKATA RAMANA, DOOR NO. 1-47, POLEPALLI VILLAGE, BUTCHAYYAPTA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRI SECRETARY MINES SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATHI GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF MINES AND GEOLOGY, IBRAHIMPATNAM, VIJAYAWADA 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF MINES AND GEOLOGY, SECTOR 4 MVP COLONY VISAKHAPATNAM 500017. 4. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF MINES AND GEOLOGY, ANAKAPALLI, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents more particularly 2 the Respondent no.2 in not considering the representation of the petitioner dated 16.04.2025 with regard to grant of a quarry lease over an extent of 4.98 hectares located in Survey No. 157, Bennavolu Panchayati, Chodavaram mandal, Visakhapatnam District, without following the due process of law, is arbitrary, illegal, in violation of Principles of Natural Justice and consequently direct the Respondent no.2 to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 16.04.2025, with regard to grant of a quarry lease over an extent of 4.98 hectares located in Survey No. 157, Bennavolu Panchayati, Chodavaram mandal, Visakhapatnam District, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P NANILU NAIDU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR MINES AND GEOLOGY WRIT PETITION NO: 25269/2025 Between: 1. M/S SURYA VENKATA RAMANA TRADERS, PVT. LTD,, MANAGING PARTNER, REP BY KOMARI VENKATA LAXMI, DOOR NO. 0-0, P.S.PETA VILLAGE, CHODAVARAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRI SECRETARY MINES SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATHI GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF MINES AND IBRAHIMPATNAM, VIJAYAWADA GEOLOGY 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF MINES AND SECTOR, 4 MVP COLONY VISAKHAPATNAM 500017. GEOLOGY 4. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF MINES AND GEOLOGY, ANAKAPALLI, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. 3 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents more particularly the Respondent no.2 in not considering the representation of the petitioner dated 16.04.2025 with regard to grant of a quarry lease over an extent of 4.98 hectares located in Survey No. 157, Bennavolu Panchayati, Chodavaram mandal, Visakhapatnam District, without following the due process of law, is arbitrary, illegal, in violation of Principles of Natural Justice and consequently direct the Respondent no.2 to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 16.04.2025, with regard to grant of a quarry lease over an extent of 4.98 hectares located in Survey No. 157, Bennavolu Panchayati, Chodavaram mandal, Visakhapatnam District, and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P NANILU NAIDU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR MINES AND GEOLOGY The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER: Heard Sri P. Nanilu Naidu, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Mines and Geology for the respondents. 2. Since the issue involved in the above Writ Petitions are one and the same, it is deemed appropriate to dispose of the cases through this ‘Common Order’. 3. The grievance of the petitioner is that they have made an application on 05.12.2021 for the grant of a quarry lease over an extent of 4 4.98 Hectares in Survey No.157, Bennavolu Panchayati, Chodavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. Since no orders have been passed on the application(s) of the petitioner, the petitioner has made a representation on 16.04.2025. Since the same was not considered, the instant Writ Petition(s) are filed. 4. When the matter is taken up for consideration today, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Mines and Geology has placed before the Court a copy of the instructions received by her in the case. A perusal of the same would reflect that the petitioner’s application in respect of the subject area overlaps with the LOI issued in the name of one M/s Sri Lakshmi Narasimha Metals & Sand Industries Private Limited and as such there is no free area available for the grant of a quarry lease in respect of the subject area. 5. Having regard to the same, since the application of the petitioner has been pending since 2021, the respondents are directed to pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, within a period of four (04) weeks from the date of receipt of the order. 6. The said instructions of the respondents are placed on record. 7. With the above observation, the Writ Petitions are disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. 5 As a sequel, all pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Date: 23.09.2025 MSI 6 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NOs: 25266 & 25269 of 2025 Date: 23.09.2025 MSI