[2025:RJ-JP:42996] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16173/2025 1. Parshuram Gurjar, S/o Lt. Ram Lal Gurjar, Aged About 33 Years, R/o V-Kotra, P-Charnet, T-Dooni, Tonk, Rajasthan. Owner Of Vehicle Registration No. RJ-26-RB-3740. 2. Prakarti Buildcom, Through Its Proprietor Anita Yadav, W/o Dhouni Lal Yadav, Aged About 41 Years, Having Its Office At 631, Kerli Dhani, Manhoarpura, Tehsil Hahpura, Jaipur. Owner Of Vehicle Registration No. RJ-52-GA-7591. 3. Banwari Saini, S/o Satyanarayan Ssaini, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Village Peeploo, Tonk, Rajasthan. Owner Of Vehicle Registration No. RJ-01-RA-7929. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary To Government, Transport Department, Parivahan Bhawan, Sahakar Marg, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Commissioner Of Transport, Transport Department, Parivahan Bhawan, Sahakar Marg, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. District Transport Authority, Kotputli. 4. District Transport Authority, Chomu. 5. District Transport Authority, Tonk. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhishek B. Sharma, Adv. with Mr. Akshit Raj Saini, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.S. Naruka, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR Order 27/10/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the instant petition has akin factual narratives and legal as under S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.11747/2025, which was decided by the [2025:RJ-JP:42996] (2 of 3) [CW-16173/2025] Co-ordinate Bench of this Court on 20.08.2025. Therefore, it is submitted that the instant petition be decided in the light of S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.11747/2025. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents has not objected to the above said contention of learned counsel for the petitioners. 3. Having heard the contentions made by the learned counsel for the parties, taking note of the material available on record in the lead petition, and the judgments cited at the Bar, this Court without going into the arena of disputed questions of facts and merits of the petition, is of a view that the impugned order, whereby the Registration Certificates of the vehicles owned/possessed by the petitioners are suspended, needs to be set aside, for the reasons that the said vehicles are the source of bread and butter of the petitioners and their families. However, the aforementioned revocation shall only be effective subject to a condition that the petitioners along with their counsel concerned shall report to/before the notice issuing authorities, on 10.11.2025, preferably in-between 11:00 am to 01:00 pm. Thereafter, due reply be filed within a period of 15 days. 4. Audience with respect to the same will be provided by competent authority on 25.11.2025. Adjudication of the same be carried out thereafter within a period of 15 days. 5. It is made clear that during the period of consideration of grievances, the RCs of the vehicles owned/possessed by the petitioners, which are suspended, shall be revoked and the status of the vehicle in furtherance to the consequential proceedings as registered and entered upon the official portal concerned, shall be updated, without further ado. [2025:RJ-JP:42996] (3 of 3) [CW-16173/2025] 6. It is made clear that no prejudice will be caused to either side on account of passing of the present order. 7. In the light of the same, the petition is disposed of with aforementioned directions being granted. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed. (ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J Mohita /36