[2025:RJ-JP:43112] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16327/2025 1. Abdul Sharif Mansuri S/o Subhan Ali Mansuri, Aged About 51 Years, R/o Opp. Nobles School, Talab Para, Baran, District Baran (Raj.) 2. Mahavir Singh Gour S/o Parvat Singh Gour, Aged About 49 Years, R/o Village Nand Gavadi, Post Ishwarpura, Tehsil Mangrol, District Baran. 3. Smt. Rampyari Meghwal W/o Om Prakash Meghwal, D/o Mathuralal, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Village And Post Mundla Bisoti, Tehsil Atru, District Baran (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary Cum Commissioner, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Director, Elementary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. 3. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Baran. 4. District Education Officer, Elementary Education Baran. 5. Peeo, Govt. Sr. Secondary School Kotari Sunda, District Baran. 6. Peeo, Govt. Sr. Secondary School Mau (Mangrol), District Baran. 7. Peeo, Govt. Sr. Secondary School Mundla Bisoti, Block Atru, District Baran. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Saini For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 27/10/2025 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioners with following prayer: [2025:RJ-JP:43112] (2 of 3) [CW-16327/2025] “By an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature thereof thereby direct the respondents to extend the notional benefit seniority to the petitioners from the date of joining of other similarly situated persons i.e. 01.10.2008 with all consequential benefits.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioners while referring and relying upon judgment dated 26.08.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.15418/2025 titled as Sadhna Nochhat Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order. 3. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioners and also material placed on record, the writ petition is disposed of in light of Sadhna Nocchat (supra) passed by this Court. 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioners are given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case referred hereinabove with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioners either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if [2025:RJ-JP:43112] (3 of 3) [CW-16327/2025] petitioners have provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioners are still aggrieved, they have a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 5. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /180