- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48854 CRP No. 307 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 307 OF 2017 (IO) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. RAMA REDDY S/O LATE VERA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, 2. SRI NARAYANA REDDY S/O LATE VERA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, BOTH ARE RESIDING AT DODDA DUNNASANDRA VILLAGE, ANUGONDANAHALLI HOBLI, HOSKOTE TALUK, BANGALORE DISTRICT- 562114 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. BASAVANNA M D., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT GOWRAMMA W/O NANJUNDA REDDY, D/O LATE VERA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/AT ECHHANGURU VILLAGE, NALUR POST, HOSUR TALUK KRISHNAGIRI DISTRICT, TAMILNADU STATE-635103 2. SRI SRINIVASA REDDY S/O LATE VERA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT DOMMASANDRA VILLAGE, Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48854 CRP No. 307 of 2017 MARAMMA GUDI BIDI, SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT- 562106. 3. SMT LAKSHMI @ NAGESHMAMMA W/O PRAKASH REDDY, D/O VERA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, R/AT BARANADA NARAYANA REDDY, HULIMANGALA, HOSKOTE, LAKUR HOBLI, MALUR TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT- 563130. 4. SRI VEERASWAMY REDDY S/O LATE NARASA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/AT NO.1112/03 MANISWAR LAYOUT, OPP F.C.I. KADUGODI, BIDARAHALLI HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, BANGALORE-67 5. SMT MANJULA W/O AMBARISH, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, KUMBENA AGRAHARA, KADUGODI POST, BIDARAHALLI HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK-67. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. AJAY R A., ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. H.S.RAMAMURTHY, ADVOCATE FOR R4 AND R5; R3 IS SERVED) THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SEC.115 OF CPC., AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 6.4.2017 PASSED ON IA IN OS NO.2068/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDE, BANGALORE (R) DISTRICT, BANGALORE, DISMISSING THE IA FILED UNDER ORDER VII RULE 11(a) OF CPC., - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48854 CRP No. 307 of 2017 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo dated 25.11.2025 seeking to withdraw the revision petition as not pressed, which reads as under: "The petitioners named above most respectfully pray that this Hon'ble Court be please to dismissed above said matter as not pressed in the interest of justice and equity." 2. The memo is taken on record. 3. In view of the said memo, the civil revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE HDK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3