MR RAJ KUMAR NARANG v. G M INFINITE DWELLING (INDIA) PVT LTD
CRP/29/2023 · 2025-11-18
V Srishananda
Original Suitbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45905 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45905 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47552 CRP No. 29 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.29 OF 2023 (IO) BETWEEN:
1.
MR RAJ KUMAR NARANG S/O SRI MOHAN LAL NARANG AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
2.
MRS KAILASH RANI W/O RAJ KUMAR NARANG AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS
BOTH ARE RESIDING AT FLAT No.603, CHANDRLOK BLOCK MANGALYA SURYASHAYA KUMDANAHALLI GATE VARTHUR ROAD, MARATHAHALLI BENGALURU-560 037. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI SANJAY KRISHNA V, ADVOCATE)
AND:
G M INFINITE DWELLING (INDIA) PVT. LTD.
A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT 1956 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.6, GM PEARL, 1ST PHASE 1ST STAGE, BTM LAYOUT BENGALURU-560 068 REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR/ AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY …RESPONDENT (RESPONDENT IS SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)
Digitally signed by MALATESH K C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47552 CRP No. 29 of 2023
THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 13.10.2022 PASSED ON I.A.NO.II IN O.S.NO.2804/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE XIV ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL BANGALORE, DISMISSING THE I.A.NO.II FILED UNDER ORDER VII RULE 11(a) AND (d) R/W SECTION 151 OF CPC FOR REJECTION OF PLIANT.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the revision petitioners has filed memo which reads as under:
“The undersigned hereby submits that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to permit the petitioners herein withdraw the above CRP in view of the ongoing settlement between the parties in O.S.No.2804/2019 giving rise to the fling of the present CRP. Hence, this memo.”
2. In view of the memo, revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
MR