CRR-1000-2025 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 238 CRR-1000-2025 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION: 21.05.2025 RAJ KUMAR AND ANR. ...PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER ... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. Puneet Pali, Advocate for petitioners. Mr. Sandeep Singh, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Mohd. Saleem, Advocate for respondent No. 2. *** SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) CRM-18482-2025 This application has been filed for compounding of the offences. Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that the matter has been compromised between the parties. For the reasons mentioned in the application and keeping in view the submission made by counsel for the parties, the application is allowed and the offence involved in the present FIR are compounded. Main case This revision petition has been filed against the impugned judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 11.01.2017 passed Anuradha 2025.05.27 23:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRR-1000-2025 (O&M) 2 by the JMIC, Ludhiana in CIS No. 38792/2013; and impugned judgment dated 19.03.2025 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Ludhiana; whereby the Courts below has convicted and awarded sentence to the petitioners as follows :- Under Section Term of Punishment Fine 148 IPC RI for 1 year Rs. 1000/- in default of payment of fine to undergo RI for one month 323 IPC read with Section 149 IPC RI for 6 months - 452 IPC RI for 2 years Rs. 1000/- in default of payment of fine to undergo RI for two month 325 IPC read with Section 149 IPC RI for 1 year Rs. 1000/- in default of payment of fine to undergo RI for one month Learned counsel, for the petitioners submits that since the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and in this regard compromise deed i.e. Annexure P-1 has already been placed on record, therefore, prays for setting aside the judgments/orders passed by the Courts below and the petitioners be ordered to be acquitted of the charges. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent does not dispute the compromise arrived at between the parties. In view of the above, finding the prayer of the counsel for the petitioners to be genuine and in view of the fact that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties, the present revision petition is allowed. Anuradha 2025.05.27 23:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRR-1000-2025 (O&M) 3 As a result of compounding, impugned judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 11.01.2017 passed by the JMIC, Ludhiana in CIS No. 38792/2013; and impugned judgment dated 19.03.2025 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Ludhiana is hereby quashed qua the petitioners. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) JUDGE 21.05.2025 anuradha/sham Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No Anuradha 2025.05.27 23:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document