CRM-M-26641 IN T 296-1 KULDEEP SIN STATE OF HA CORAM:- HO Present: Mr for Mr Mr for RUPINDERJIT 1. Th FIR No.410, da registered at Po subsequent proc 10.11.2025 and and P-20). 2. Th had directed th their statements report qua the g 26641-2018 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJ AT CHANDIGAR CR Da P SINGH TANWAR AND OTHER Versus F HARYANA & ANOTHER HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPIN Mr. Vinay Kumar Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Vikram Singh, AAG, Haryana Mr. Rajat Sheokand, Advocate for respondent No.2. ***** ERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) This is a petition filed under Sectio , dated 14.11.2017, under Section at Police Station Bhupani, District F nt proceedings arising therefrom on t 5 and affidavit of complainant dated The co-ordinate bench of this Cou ted the parties to appear before the ments recorded and the learned Magi a the genuineness of the compromise. PUNJAB & HARYANA IGARH CRM-M-26641-2018 (O&M) Date of decision: 27.03.2026 THERS ….Petitioners ....Respondents UPINDERJIT CHAHAL vocate ryana. Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of ections 120-B, 406, 420, 506 IPC, trict Faridabad (Annexure P-13) and on the basis of compromise dated t dated 02.02.2026 (Annexure P-19 Court vide order dated 05.02.2026 e the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get Magistrate was directed to send its mise. s ents ng of IPC, ) and ated 19 2026 get d its GURPREET 2026.04.07 12:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document. CRM-M-26641 3. Pur Judicial Magist On the basis of Faridabad has compromise ha any coercion or 4. Lea have not dispute 5. In continue with th 6. Fol of this Court in another 2007 Supreme Court SCC 303, this p Sections 120- District Faridab therefrom on t complainant dat 7. Pen of, accordingly. 27.03.2026 Gurpreet 26641-2018 (O&M) 2 Pursuant to the aforesaid order, pa agistrate First Class, Faridabad and asis of the statements so recorded, has submitted report dated 16.03 ise has been effected between the p ion or undue influence. Learned State counsel as well as disputed the factum of compromise bet In view of the above, no useful with the proceedings before the trial C Following the principles laid down ourt in Kulwinder Singh and others 007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 an ourt in Gian Singh Versus State of , this petition is allowed and FIR No -B, 406, 420, 506 IPC, registere Faridabad (Annexure P-13) and sub on the basis of compromise dated ant dated 02.02.2026 (Annexure P-19 a Pending miscellaneous application ingly. i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No er, parties have appeared before the and got their statements recorded. ded, Judicial Magistrate First Class, 16.03.2026 to the effect that the the parties voluntarily and without ell as counsel for respondent No.2 ise between the parties. useful purpose would be served to trial Court in the instant FIR. d down by the Full Bench judgment hers Versus State of Punjab and 2 and approved by the Hon’ble te of Punjab and others (2012) 10 IR No.410, dated 14.11.2017, under gistered at Police Station Bhupani, subsequent proceedings arising dated 10.11.2025 and affidavit of 19 and P-20) are quashed. lication(s), if any, stand(s) disposed (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) JUDGE es/No e the rded. lass, t the thout No.2 d to ment nd ble 10 nder pani, ising it of osed AL) GURPREET 2026.04.07 12:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.