[2025:RJ-JP:43103] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18976/2023 Poonam Kumari D/o Shri Prabhu Narayan Kumawat, Aged About 40 Years, R/o 47, Shiva Colony, Tonk Phatak, Near J.p. Underpass, Jaipur Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Panchayati Raj (Elementary Education) Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat Jaipur 2. Director Elementary Education Rajasthan, Bikaner, Rajasthan 3. District Education Officer, Elementary Education, Shiksha Sankul, Jaipur 4. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Jaipur 5. Peeo, Government Upper Primary School Duduawala, Tehsil Bassi, District Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.D. Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Dheeraj Tripathi, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 27/10/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “a) By an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature thereof the respondents may kindly be directed to give posting to the petitioner on her appointed post of Teacher Level -2 Social Science in any of the four schools i.e. (1) Government Upper Primary School, Ballupura, Sumel Bassi Jaipur, (2) Government Upper Primary School, Khojiyon ki Dhani, Muhana, Sanganer, Jaipur (3) Government Upper Primary School Amliki Dhani, Vatika, Sanganer Jaipur (4) Government Upper Primary School Dabar Ki Dhani, Dehmikalan Sanganer, Jaipur with all nature consequences thereof. [2025:RJ-JP:43103] (2 of 2) [CW-18976/2023] b) Any other relief as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper be also passed in favour of petitioners.” 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner while referring order dated 23.01.2006 in D.B. CWP No. 5504/2004, Kailash Chandra Harijan Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Reported as 2006 (2) RLW 1700 (Raj) submits that issue raised herein is settled by a Division Bench and the writ petition be disposed of accordingly. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case referred hereinabove with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in her representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, she has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. Needless to say that if ratio is applicable, then benefit to petitioner be provided without any delay. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /120