APHC010077852014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3327] WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 2997/2014 Between: 1. YUHITHA REDDY CULTURAL ASSOCIATION,, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, P.M. VARA PRASAD REDDY, S/O OBUL REDDY, AGED 52 YEARS, OCC: PRESIDENT, R/O 4-120, SIMHADRIPURAM, YSR (KADAPA) DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER A N D 1. THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REGISTRATION & STAMPS DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. THE COMMISSIONER AND INSPECTOR GENERAL REGISTRATION, AND STAMPS, A.P., HYDERABAD. 3. THE DY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION AND STAMPS, KADAPA. 4. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR OF SOCIETIES, PRODDUTUR. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ's or Order/s more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the Irid respondent in receiving the annual list of the petitioner association, as being illegal, arbitrary and contrary to Section 9 of the A.P. Societies Registration Act, 2001and consequently direct the 4th respondent to receive the annual list of the petitioner association and be pleased 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 3681 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to issue interim directions to the 4th respondent to forthwith receive and return the annual list of the petitioner association and be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V VENKATA MAYUR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 3 O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed seeking to declare the inaction of 4th respondent in receiving the annual list of petitioner association, as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to Section 9 of the Andhra Pradesh Societies Registration Act, 2001 and consequently, direct 4th respondent to receive the Annual List of the petitioner association. 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Veera Reddy, learned counsel appearing on behalf of M/s.V.Venkata Mayur, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive and the matter has become infructuous. 3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. 4. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed. _ _____________ _ JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY 3rd December, 2025. DNB