Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45890 (AP)

CHEPURI ANJANEYULU v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/37356/2022 · 2025-11-18

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010623952022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 37356/2022 Between: 1. CHEPURI ANJANEYULU, S/O CHEPURI MANI BRAHMACHARI HINDU, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCC. CARPENTER, R/O 15-1- 125, 1ST LINE, NEHRU NAGAR, MACHERLA PALNADU DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY- HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PALNADU DISTRICT 3. THE SI OF POLICE, PIDUGURALLA POLICE STATION 4. THE DY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PIDUGURALLA ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in calling the petitioner to Piduguralla Police Station frequently as illegal, arbitrary violative of principals of natural justice, apart from being contrary to the mandate of Article 21 of Constitution of India apart from intrusion of his Right to privacy, and consequently direct the 3rd respondent not to call the petitioner and harass the petitioner by directing to attend Piduguralla Police Station, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P PADMAVATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed, by the Petitioner for the following relief: <.... to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in calling the petitioner to Piduguralla Police Station frequently as illegal, arbitrary violative of principals of natural justice, apart from being contrary to the mandate of Article 21 of Constitution of India apart from intrusion of his Right to privacy, and consequently direct the 3rd respondent not to call the petitioner and harass the petitioner by directing to attend Piduguralla Police Station, and pass ...= None represented for the Petitioner. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions would submit that respondent Police never called the petitioner or his family members to the Police Station and would submit that this Writ Petition may be disposed of by passing appropriate orders. In that view, the Writ Petition is disposed of. Police are directed to follow due process of law. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 41529 of 2022 19.11.2025 Mjl /*